Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Nationwide Building Society v Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch & Anor [2025] EWHC 1046 (Comm) (01 May 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

  • The case concerns Nationwide Building Society’s tax liability arising from an oversight: certain US Medium Term Notes issued in 2018-2019 were not listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE), thus losing the quoted Eurobond exemption from UK withholding tax.
  • Nationwide initially targeted both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) as Trustee/Paying Agent and Allen & Overy (A&O) as legal adviser for liability; now only pursuing A&O.
  • A&O seeks contribution from BNY, alleging BNY owed a duty to confirm listing status; BNY denies such duty and seeks summary judgment.
  • The dispute centers on contractual duties under the Indenture and legal responsibilities related to note listing and withholding tax consequences.

Sanctions Highlights

  • — No sanctions implications identified in the case.

Emerging Risks

  • Legal risk for trustees and paying agents in confirming regulatory compliance (e.g., listing status) to avoid tax liabilities.
  • Potential for increased scrutiny on legal advisers’ and trustees’ roles in structured finance transactions.
  • Risk of costly litigation over technical oversights in bond issuance documentation and regulatory filings.

Geopolitical Impact

  • The case highlights regulatory and tax enforcement rigor within the UK financial markets, impacting EU, UK, and US cross-border capital raising.
  • UK’s withholding tax regime and listing requirements under the FCA’s Official List remain critical for international issuers.
  • The involvement of UK courts and law firms (A&O, Hogan Lovells, Clyde & Co) underscores London’s role as a global financial and legal hub.
  • The case may influence international investor confidence in UK bond markets post-Brexit, especially regarding tax certainty and regulatory compliance.

Economic Intelligence

  • The oversight resulted in a “windfall” tax gain for HMRC and the UK Treasury, emphasizing the fiscal impact of regulatory technicalities.
  • The US Medium Term Note Programme remains a significant capital-raising vehicle for UK issuers targeting US institutional investors.
  • The case underscores the economic importance of listing status for tax efficiency in bond issuance.
  • Potential financial exposure for legal advisers and trustees in structured finance may increase professional indemnity costs.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Issuers should implement rigorous compliance checks to ensure listing applications are completed and confirmed to secure tax exemptions.
  • Trustees and paying agents must clarify and document their duties regarding regulatory confirmations to mitigate liability risks.
  • Legal advisers should enhance due diligence and client advisories on listing and tax implications in cross-border note issuances.
  • Financial institutions and law firms should review contractual waivers and indemnities to limit exposure from technical oversights.
  • Monitor UK regulatory and tax developments affecting bond issuance to anticipate emerging compliance risks.

---

**Source Notes:**

Case Title: *Nationwide Building Society v Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch & Anor [2025] EWHC 1046 (Comm)*

Link: https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1046.txt

Brief metadata