Executive Summary
This case concerns a dispute arising from an escrow agreement involving the sale of an oil tanker, MT KIBAZ, between Virgo Marine (Dubai) and Kibaz Shipping LP (Marshall Islands), with Reed Smith LLP (RSUK) acting as escrow holder and Barclays Bank as the third-party bank. Following the designation of Virgo by the US OFAC under Executive Order 13846, RSUK instructed Barclays to freeze escrow funds, leading to litigation over alleged breaches of contract and fiduciary duties. The core issues revolve around RSUK’s obligations under the escrow agreement, Barclays’ refusal to release funds citing US sanctions compliance, and the impact of US sanctions on the transaction.
Sanctions Highlights
- Virgo was designated by OFAC on 29 September 2022 under US Executive Order 13846, triggering sanctions restrictions.
- RSUK initially treated itself as a “US person” subject to EO 13846, instructing Barclays to block Virgo’s funds.
- Barclays refused to release escrow funds citing risk of violating US sanctions, despite RSUK later rescinding its “US person” status.
- The escrow agreement limits RSUK’s liability except for gross negligence or fraud; RSUK’s duty was administrative—to instruct Barclays.
- Barclays’ refusal to comply with RSUK’s payment instructions is linked directly to US sanctions compliance obligations.
- The dispute highlights complexities in cross-jurisdictional sanctions enforcement involving UK, US, and UAE entities.
Emerging Risks
- Escrow holders and banks face heightened risk of sanctions exposure when handling funds linked to designated entities, even if acting under third-party instructions.
- Ambiguities in escrow agreements about liability and indemnities can lead to protracted litigation when sanctions intervene.
- Banks’ broad discretion under customer agreements to block transactions for reputational or legal risk may conflict with escrow holders’ contractual duties.
- The evolving interpretation of “US person” status for foreign entities complicates compliance and fund release decisions.
- Arbitration and court proceedings may be delayed or complicated by sanctions-related freezes, impacting commercial certainty.
Geopolitical Impact
- The case underscores the extraterritorial reach of US sanctions (OFAC EO 13846) affecting companies registered in Dubai and transactions involving Marshall Islands entities.
- UK courts are adjudicating disputes arising from US sanctions, reflecting the UK’s role as a global financial hub and its interaction with US regulatory regimes.
- The involvement of UAE (Virgo’s registration and payment origin), UK (RSUK and Barclays), and US (sanctions authority) illustrates complex multilateral sanctions enforcement.
- The case may influence how EU and UK entities manage sanctions risk, especially regarding escrow arrangements with parties in sanctioned jurisdictions.
- It highlights tensions between national sanctions regimes and international commercial law frameworks.
Economic Intelligence
- The frozen escrow funds total approximately USD 13.3 million (Deposit plus Balance).
- The designation of Virgo and subsequent sanctions have disrupted a high-value maritime asset transaction, potentially affecting market liquidity in oil tanker sales.
- Banks’ cautious approach to sanctions compliance may increase transaction costs and delay payments in cross-border deals.
- Legal uncertainty around escrow liabilities and sanctions compliance may deter financial institutions from facilitating similar transactions involving sanctioned or high-risk jurisdictions.
- The case signals increased operational and legal costs for firms operating in sectors vulnerable to sanctions enforcement.
Strategic Recommendations
- Parties engaging in escrow agreements involving cross-border transactions should explicitly address sanctions compliance, liability, and indemnity clauses to mitigate risks.
- Escrow holders and banks must maintain robust sanctions screening and clear protocols for handling designated parties’ funds, including contingency plans for conflicting legal obligations.
- Legal counsel should advise clients on the implications of US extraterritorial sanctions and the potential for third-party banks to refuse payment instructions.
- Consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to expedite resolution where sanctions-related freezes cause commercial disruption.
- Monitor evolving sanctions designations and regulatory guidance closely to anticipate and manage emerging compliance challenges in international maritime and financial transactions.
---
**Source Notes:**
San