Executive Summary
This case involves Dmitry Gerasimenko and associated claimants alleging a coordinated "Raider Attack" to expropriate their interests in the Russian metallurgy Red October Group. The defendants include VTB Capital Plc (VTBC), a UK-based entity under Russian government control, now in administration due to sanctions following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The claim hinges on VTBC’s alleged involvement in wrongful criminal charges against Gerasimenko via a document ("Explanations Document") submitted to Russian authorities. VTBC denies involvement, and the court is considering a summary judgment application to dismiss claims against VTBC, which would affect jurisdiction over other defendants.
Sanctions Highlights
- VTBC entered administration on 6 December 2022 following sanctions imposed after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
- Sanctions have directly impacted VTBC’s operational status and control, placing it under administrators.
- The claimants argue that sanctions and the geopolitical context prevent a fair trial in Russia, justifying English jurisdiction.
- The case underscores sanctions’ role in complicating cross-border litigation involving Russian state-controlled entities.
Emerging Risks
- Potential for increased litigation involving Russian state-controlled companies under sanctions.
- Risk of asset expropriation claims linked to politically motivated corporate raids ("Raider Attacks") in Russia.
- Challenges in evidence gathering and fair trial prospects in Russian jurisdiction due to political interference.
- Legal uncertainty for foreign investors and counterparties dealing with Russian entities under sanctions and administration.
Geopolitical Impact
- The case is embedded in the broader Russia-Ukraine conflict context, with sanctions imposed by Western states including the UK and US.
- VTBC’s administration is a direct consequence of Western sanctions targeting Russian financial institutions.
- Allegations implicate Russian President Putin and his inner circle in orchestrating asset seizures, highlighting state involvement in economic warfare.
- The litigation reflects tensions between Russian state interests and Western legal systems asserting jurisdiction over Russian entities.
Economic Intelligence
- The Red October Group is a significant player in the Russian metallurgy sector, a strategic industry.
- The dispute involves complex ownership and control issues exacerbated by sanctions and political interference.
- VTBC’s administration disrupts investment banking services linked to Russian state-controlled enterprises.
- The case illustrates the economic fallout of sanctions on Russian corporate governance and foreign investment protections.
Strategic Recommendations
- Monitor ongoing legal developments for precedent on jurisdiction and sanctions-related claims involving Russian entities.
- Advise clients on heightened due diligence and risk assessment when engaging with Russian state-controlled companies under sanctions.
- Prepare for potential asset recovery or expropriation claims linked to geopolitical conflicts and sanction regimes.
- Engage with legal counsel experienced in cross-jurisdictional disputes involving Russian law and Western sanctions.
- Consider the impact of sanctions on enforcement and collection prospects in litigation involving Russian defendants.
---
**Source Notes:**
Sanctions Intelligence Digest, England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decision [2025] EWHC 1333 (Comm)
https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1333.html