Executive Summary
This judgment addresses insurance claims by aircraft lessors (AerCap, DAE, Falcon, Merx, Genesis, others) for aircraft and engines leased to Russian airlines that have not been returned following Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The lessors seek indemnity under their Lessor Policies (LPs), specifically Contingent Cover and Possessed Cover, against insurers. The case hinges on interpretation of policy terms, causation of loss, and the impact of US, EU, and UK sanctions imposed on Russia. The court analyzed the operative peril(s), timing of loss, and sanctions-related defenses by insurers.
Sanctions Highlights
- The aircraft lessors’ claims are complicated by extensive US, EU, and UK sanctions targeting Russia post-February 2022 invasion.
- Sanctions include export controls, asset freezes, and prohibitions on aircraft operations within Russian jurisdiction.
- Sanctions have effectively prevented return or repossession of leased aircraft, forming a core basis for claims under Contingent and Possessed Cover.
- Insurers invoked sanctions-related defenses, including compliance with BIS, OFAC, and EU restrictive measures, challenging indemnity obligations.
- The judgment discusses the interplay between sanctions regimes and insurance coverage, emphasizing the legal and practical impact of sanctions on loss causation.
Emerging Risks
- Increased risk of asset immobilization and loss for lessors leasing to sanctioned jurisdictions, especially Russia.
- Potential for protracted litigation over insurance coverage interpretation in sanction-impacted disputes.
- Growing complexity in assessing causation where concurrent causes include war risks and sanctions.
- Risk of aggregate policy limits being tested by large-scale claims arising from geopolitical conflicts.
- Insurers face heightened exposure to claims linked to geopolitical sanctions, requiring robust underwriting and risk assessment.
Geopolitical Impact
- The Russian invasion of Ukraine triggered a cascade of sanctions by the US, EU, UK, and allied states, severely restricting aviation leasing and operations.
- Sanctions have isolated Russian airlines from Western lessors, disrupting global aviation leasing markets.
- The case highlights the geopolitical leverage of sanctions as a tool to enforce compliance and impact commercial contracts.
- Countries involved in sanctions enforcement include US, UK, EU members (Germany, France), Canada, Japan, and others.
- The aviation sector is a frontline casualty of geopolitical conflict, with implications for international trade and finance.
Economic Intelligence
- The aircraft lessors face significant financial exposure due to loss of leased assets valued in the hundreds of millions of USD.
- Insurance recoveries are critical to mitigating losses but are complicated by policy interpretation and sanctions compliance.
- The case underscores the economic impact of sanctions on asset values and leasing revenues.
- Disruption to Russian aviation leasing affects global supply chains, financing, and insurance markets.
- Aggregate policy limits (e.g., US$300 million in AerCap’s case) are focal points for economic risk management.
Strategic Recommendations
- Lessors should conduct rigorous due diligence on geopolitical risks and sanctions compliance before leasing to high-risk jurisdictions.
- Insurance policies must clearly define coverage scope regarding sanctions and war risks to reduce litigation risk.
- Insurers should enhance underwriting frameworks to incorporate geopolitical risk analytics and sanctions exposure.
- Parties should consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to expedite claims related to sanction-impacted assets.
- Stakeholders must monitor evolving sanctions regimes and adjust contractual and insurance terms proactively.
---
**Source Notes:**
Sanctions Intelligence Digest, England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions [2025] EWHC 1430 (Comm)
https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1430.html