Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Kiko UK Ltd v Jamino Limited (in liquidation) & Anor [2025] EWHC 1510 (Comm) (20 June 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

  • Kiko UK Ltd assigned its lease at 48 Oxford St, London, to Jamino Ltd (in liquidation), a subsidiary of Pianoforte Holdings S.p.A.
  • Pianoforte guaranteed Jamino’s lease obligations under a Parent Company Guarantee (PCG), including indemnification for unpaid rent and covenant breaches.
  • Jamino defaulted on rent; Kiko paid over £1.29m to landlord Pontegadea UK Ltd, recovering only £80,000 from Jamino.
  • Summary judgment awarded Kiko £969,380 plus interest against Pianoforte; remaining claims proceeded to trial.
  • Disputes include reimbursement of final payments, enforceability of a £170,492 discount under a Settlement Agreement, breach related to a new lease, and entitlement to legal costs and interest.

Sanctions Highlights

  • — No sanctions implications identified in the case text.

Emerging Risks

  • Potential enforcement challenges against foreign parent companies (Pianoforte, Italy) in UK courts.
  • Risk of non-payment despite summary judgment, as Pianoforte has not satisfied the debt.
  • Uncertainty over the Settlement Agreement’s enforceability may prolong litigation and financial exposure.
  • Kiko’s inability to sub-lease premises may increase financial losses.

Geopolitical Impact

  • UK jurisdiction exercised over an Italian parent company, reflecting cross-border commercial litigation dynamics within the EU-UK post-Brexit legal environment.
  • The case underscores UK courts’ willingness to enforce guarantees involving foreign entities, impacting international lease and guarantee arrangements.

Economic Intelligence

  • The lease’s initial rent was £525,000 per annum, with total payments by Kiko to Pontegadea exceeding £1.29 million post-assignment.
  • Summary judgment awarded nearly £1 million plus interest, indicating significant financial exposure for Pianoforte.
  • The dispute over a £170,492 discount and potential damages related to a new lease may increase Pianoforte’s liabilities.
  • Legal costs and interest claims add further economic burden on Pianoforte.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Litigants should ensure clarity and enforceability of settlement agreements to avoid protracted disputes.
  • Creditors must assess risks of parent company guarantees, especially with foreign entities, and consider enforcement mechanisms early.
  • Kiko should pursue sub-leasing aggressively to mitigate ongoing losses from vacant premises.
  • Monitor UK court rulings on cross-border guarantees for precedents affecting similar commercial lease disputes.
  • Consider alternative dispute resolution to resolve outstanding issues related to discounts and indemnities to limit costs.

---

**Source Notes:**

Sanctions Intelligence Digest, [https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1510.html](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1510.html)

Brief metadata