Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Kiko UK Ltd v Jamino Limited (in liquidation) & Anor [2025] EWHC 1510 (Comm) (20 June 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

  • Kiko UK Ltd (assignor) claims against Jamino Ltd (assignee, in liquidation) and Pianoforte Holdings S.p.A. (parent guarantor) over unpaid rent and lease obligations at 48 Oxford St, London.
  • Lease assigned to Jamino in 2019; Pianoforte guaranteed Jamino’s obligations under a Parent Company Guarantee (PCG).
  • Jamino defaulted on rent; Kiko paid £1.3m to landlord Pontegadea UK Ltd under an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA).
  • Summary judgment awarded Kiko £969k plus interest against Pianoforte; remaining claims proceeded to trial.
  • Disputes include reimbursement of final payments, enforceability of a £170k settlement discount, breach related to a new lease, and entitlement to legal costs and interest.

Sanctions Highlights

  • — No sanctions implications identified in the case.

Emerging Risks

  • Potential enforcement challenges due to Jamino’s liquidation and lease disclaimer.
  • Uncertainty over the settlement agreement’s enforceability may delay recovery.
  • Risk of future losses linked to the new lease obligations and sub-letting difficulties.
  • Legal costs and indemnity claims may increase financial exposure for Pianoforte.

Geopolitical Impact

  • Case involves UK jurisdiction with an Italian parent company guarantor, highlighting cross-border commercial risk.
  • Enforcement of UK court judgments against foreign parent companies remains critical in transnational lease and guarantee disputes.
  • Reflects UK commercial courts’ role in upholding contractual guarantees involving EU-based entities post-Brexit.

Economic Intelligence

  • Lease rent initially £525,000 p.a., with payments by Kiko totaling over £1.3 million due to Jamino’s defaults.
  • Summary judgment awarded nearly £1 million plus interest, indicating significant financial liability for Pianoforte.
  • The £170,492.18 settlement discount’s validity affects net recoverable sums.
  • The financial impact extends to costs of entering a new lease and potential future damages until November 2026.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Kiko should rigorously pursue enforcement of the summary judgment debt against Pianoforte.
  • Clarify legal standing on the settlement discount to avoid protracted disputes.
  • Monitor Pianoforte’s financial position given cross-border enforcement complexities.
  • Assess risks and potential compensation related to the new lease and sub-letting failures.
  • Document and quantify all legal costs for indemnity claims to strengthen recovery efforts.
  • Consider early negotiation or mediation to resolve outstanding disputes and minimize further costs.

---

**Source Notes:**

*Sanctions Intelligence Digest* — [Kiko UK Ltd v Jamino Limited (in liquidation) & Anor [2025] EWHC 1510 (Comm)](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1510.txt)

Brief metadata