Executive Summary
- The Republic of India is engaged in a complex arbitration dispute with three Mauritian companies (CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd and others) concerning authority to represent the companies in arbitration proceedings.
- The dispute arises from the termination of a 2005 satellite lease contract between Devas Multimedia Private Limited (an Indian company partly owned by the Mauritian companies) and Antrix Corporation (India’s space agency commercial arm).
- Multiple arbitrations and court proceedings have ensued since 2011, including ICC arbitration in India, BIT arbitrations under the India-Mauritius Bilateral Investment Treaty, and liquidation proceedings against Devas in India.
- The Mauritian companies are in administration under Mauritian law, with an Administrator appointed who claims sole authority to represent them, conflicting with the directors and shareholders who instruct Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.
- The English High Court is addressing preliminary legal questions about which law governs authority to instruct lawyers in the arbitration seated in England.
Sanctions Highlights
- — No sanctions implications identified in the case.
Emerging Risks
- Continued jurisdictional and procedural disputes risk prolonging arbitration and litigation, increasing legal costs and uncertainty.
- Conflicting rulings across multiple jurisdictions (India, Mauritius, England, The Hague) create enforcement challenges for arbitration awards.
- Allegations of fraud and public policy violations in Indian courts, despite rejection by other international courts, may undermine investor confidence.
- The appointment of an Administrator with exclusive authority under Mauritian law complicates representation and may delay resolution.
Geopolitical Impact
- The case highlights tensions between India and Mauritius regarding investment protections and judicial sovereignty.
- The involvement of Indian courts in setting aside arbitration awards raises concerns about India’s adherence to international arbitration norms.
- The dispute implicates broader India-US relations indirectly, given the US$562.5 million ICC Award and international arbitration venues.
- Mauritius’ role as a key investment hub and treaty partner is tested by the administration and liquidation proceedings.
Economic Intelligence
- The dispute centers on multi-hundred-million-dollar awards (US$562.5 million ICC Award; US$111 million BIT Award) with significant financial stakes for India and the Mauritian companies.
- The liquidation of Devas and subsequent legal challenges threaten to disrupt digital multimedia satellite services and related investments.
- Prolonged arbitration and litigation may impact investor sentiment toward India-Mauritius bilateral investments.
- Enforcement of awards and recovery of damages remain uncertain amid conflicting court decisions.
Strategic Recommendations
- Monitor developments in the English High Court’s determination of applicable law on representation authority to anticipate procedural outcomes.
- Assess risks of parallel proceedings in India, Mauritius, and international arbitration forums for potential impact on enforcement and costs.
- Engage with legal counsel to prepare for possible appeals and challenges to administration orders and arbitration awards.
- Consider diplomatic channels to mitigate geopolitical tensions affecting investment treaty enforcement.
- Evaluate the financial exposure and reputational risks for stakeholders involved in the Devas-Antrix dispute and related arbitrations.
---
**Source Notes:**
Sanctions Intelligence Digest | [https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1738.html](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1738.html)