Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Jones v Persons Unknown & Ors [2025] EWHC 1823 (Comm) (10 June 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

This case concerns Gary Jones, a victim of a large-scale cryptocurrency fraud involving a fake investment platform, extickpro.com, allegedly operated by cybercriminals based in Russia. Jones invested approximately £480,206, acquiring about 89.6 Bitcoin, which were subsequently misappropriated and dispersed across blockchain wallets. The High Court granted freezing injunctions and summary judgment against unknown fraudsters, non-innocent receivers, and Huobi Global Limited, a Seychelles-registered crypto exchange holding a key wallet (“tHEL wallet”) linked to the fraud. Kyrrex Limited, a St Vincent and the Grenadines-registered company, sought to join the case, challenging prior judgments and asset claims.

Sanctions Highlights

— No direct sanctions implications identified in the case text.

Emerging Risks

  • Increasing sophistication of cross-border crypto frauds exploiting anonymity and jurisdictional gaps.
  • Challenges in asset recovery due to complex wallet ownership and transfer chains.
  • Non-compliance by crypto exchanges (e.g., Huobi’s failure to disclose account holder identities) undermines enforcement.
  • Potential misuse of freezing injunctions and civil procedure rules by third parties (e.g., Kyrrex Limited) to contest judgments and complicate recovery.

Geopolitical Impact

  • Alleged Russian origin of fraudsters highlights ongoing cybercrime risks linked to Russian actors.
  • UK courts actively pursuing crypto asset recovery, reflecting UK’s legal leadership in crypto litigation.
  • Involvement of companies registered in Seychelles (Huobi) and St Vincent and the Grenadines (Kyrrex) underscores regulatory arbitrage in offshore jurisdictions.
  • US dollar valuation of Bitcoin assets (~US$345 million) indicates global financial stakes and cross-border enforcement challenges.

Economic Intelligence

  • Fraud involved approximately 89.6 Bitcoin, valued at £1.536 million at judgment time, with wallet balances fluctuating significantly (up to 14,986 Bitcoin reported at one point).
  • The case exemplifies financial losses from fraudulent crypto investment schemes and the difficulties in tracing and freezing digital assets.
  • Huobi’s partial compliance (transferring Bitcoin from a different wallet) suggests operational complexities in crypto asset custody.
  • The case may influence investor confidence and regulatory scrutiny in cryptocurrency markets.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Enhance due diligence and monitoring of crypto exchanges, especially those registered in offshore jurisdictions.
  • Strengthen international cooperation for cybercrime investigations targeting Russian-linked actors.
  • Develop clearer legal frameworks for identifying and holding accountable “persons unknown” in crypto frauds.
  • Encourage crypto platforms to improve transparency and compliance with court orders to facilitate asset recovery.
  • Monitor procedural tactics by third parties (e.g., Kyrrex) that may delay or obstruct enforcement actions.
  • Promote public awareness on risks of fraudulent crypto investment platforms and the importance of secure trading practices.

---

**Source Notes:**

Case Title: *Sanctions Intelligence Digest*

Link: https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1823.txt

Brief metadata