Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Perfect Marine Ltd v Sodrugestvo Turkey Tarim Tasimacilik Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret AS & Ors [2025] EWHC 1940 (Comm) (25 July 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

  • The case concerns a cargo claim involving 51,587.190 MT of soybeans shipped from Brazil to Ukraine in March 2021 aboard the vessel "PAPA JOHN."
  • The vessel was unable to discharge cargo in Ukraine and diverted to Aliaga, Turkey, where the cargo was found damaged due to self-heating and moisture.
  • The Claimant issued replacement "Switch Bills of Lading" backdated to original shipment, despite cargo deterioration.
  • The Defendants allege the Claimant discarded approximately 2.5 MT of cargo while off Ukraine, causing a shortage claim of 317.14 MT and losses of USD 198,212.50.
  • The Claimant disputes liability, citing inherent vice and lack of fault under the Hague Rules; the Defendants counterclaim for breach of contract and negligence.
  • The Court is considering amendments to counterclaims and the timeliness of claims under the Hague Rules.

Sanctions Highlights

  • — No sanctions implications identified in the case text.

Emerging Risks

  • Cargo deterioration during transit due to self-heating and moisture presents risks for future shipments of agricultural commodities.
  • Disputes over cargo handling and discarding practices at transshipment points (Ukraine to Turkey) may increase litigation exposure.
  • Backdating of bills of lading ("Switch Bills") raises concerns about documentation integrity and potential contractual disputes.
  • Time-bar issues under Hague Rules highlight risks of claims being dismissed on procedural grounds.

Geopolitical Impact

  • The cargo route disruption is linked to the Ukraine conflict, preventing discharge at Pivdennyi port.
  • Diversion to Turkey (Aliaga) underscores Turkey’s role as a critical alternative logistics hub amid regional instability.
  • The case reflects broader trade and supply chain challenges caused by geopolitical tensions between Ukraine and Russia, affecting commodity flows.

Economic Intelligence

  • The cargo value loss claimed is approximately USD 198,212.50 due to alleged short delivery and damage.
  • The dispute involves significant quantities of soybeans, a key agricultural commodity impacting global food and feed markets.
  • Delays and cargo damage may increase insurance and freight costs for similar shipments in the Black Sea region.
  • The case highlights economic risks for exporters and importers relying on Ukrainian ports amid ongoing conflict.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Parties should ensure rigorous cargo inspection and documentation at all transit points to mitigate disputes.
  • Legal teams must closely monitor Hague Rules deadlines to preserve claim rights and avoid procedural dismissals.
  • Stakeholders should assess alternative routing and logistics strategies to reduce reliance on conflict-affected ports.
  • Consider enhanced contractual clauses addressing cargo handling, documentation amendments, and force majeure related to geopolitical disruptions.
  • Monitor Turkey’s evolving role as a regional logistics hub for potential opportunities and risks.

---

Source Notes: *Sanctions Intelligence Digest* — [https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1940.html](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1940.html)

Brief metadata