Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Perfect Marine Ltd v Sodrugestvo Turkey Tarim Tasimacilik Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret AS & Ors [2025] EWHC 1940 (Comm) (25 July 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

  • Perfect Marine Ltd (Claimant) sued Sodrugestvo Turkey Tarim Tasimacilik Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret A.S. and others (Defendants) over damaged soybean cargo shipped from Brazil to Ukraine in 2021.
  • Cargo could not be discharged in Ukraine; vessel diverted to Aliaga, Turkey, where cargo was found damaged by self-heating and moisture.
  • Claimant admitted discarding a small quantity (~2.5 MT, 0.005%) of cargo off Ukraine due to condensation damage, which Defendants dispute.
  • Defendants seek damages for damaged cargo and for alleged short delivery caused by discarded cargo.
  • Legal dispute centers on liability under Hague Rules, timing of claims, and validity of amendments adding shortage claim.

Sanctions Highlights

  • — No sanctions implications identified in the case.

Emerging Risks

  • Cargo damage due to self-heating and moisture highlights risks in transporting agricultural commodities to conflict-affected or unstable regions.
  • Disputes over cargo handling practices (e.g., discarding damaged goods at sea) may increase litigation risks in maritime trade.
  • Use of “switch bills of lading” post-inspection raises potential for contractual and evidentiary complications.
  • Prolonged delays and rerouting due to geopolitical instability (Ukraine conflict) create operational and legal uncertainties.

Geopolitical Impact

  • Ukraine conflict directly impacted cargo discharge, forcing diversion to Turkey.
  • Turkey’s role as alternative port (Aliaga) underscores its strategic importance in regional trade amid Eastern European instability.
  • The case reflects broader supply chain disruptions caused by geopolitical tensions in Eastern Europe affecting global agricultural exports.

Economic Intelligence

  • Cargo volume: 51,587 MT soybeans; short delivery claim: 317.14 MT.
  • Claimed loss for discarded cargo: USD 198,212.50.
  • Cargo deterioration due to self-heating and moisture resulted in significant value diminution.
  • Delays and rerouting increased costs and risk exposure for all parties.
  • Use of backdated switch bills may affect market confidence and insurance claims.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Parties should ensure rigorous documentation and inspection protocols, especially when cargo is rerouted due to geopolitical events.
  • Consider enhanced risk mitigation strategies for shipments to conflict zones, including insurance coverage for delays and spoilage.
  • Legal teams should closely monitor timing rules under Hague Rules to avoid time-barred claims.
  • Stakeholders in maritime trade should review practices around discarding damaged cargo to minimize liability.
  • Monitor Turkey’s evolving role as a logistics hub amid Eastern European instability for future trade route planning.

---

**Source Notes:**

Case Title: *Perfect Marine Ltd v Sodrugestvo Turkey Tarim Tasimacilik Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret AS & Ors* [2025] EWHC 1940 (Comm)

Link: https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/1940.txt

Brief metadata