Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Abudantia BV v Fastron Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 234 (Comm) (10 February 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions — Geo ✓

Executive Summary

This case concerns a contractual dispute between Abudantia B.V. and Fastron Ltd regarding a Trademark Licensing Agreement (TLA) for the Parimatch brand’s use in the Turkish-speaking online gambling market. The core issue is whether the TLA automatically renewed for three years after the initial one-year lock-in period ended on 9 January 2022. Abudantia claims positive business performance and automatic renewal, while Fastron contends poor performance justified termination. The court examined the relationship between the parties, the Parimatch Group’s structure, and the operational realities of the joint venture.

Sanctions Highlights

— No sanctions implications identified in the case.

Emerging Risks

  • Potential reputational damage to Parimatch brand due to public legal disputes.
  • Risk of operational disruption in Turkish-speaking markets if trademark use is restrained.
  • Legal uncertainty over trademark licensing agreements may deter future partnerships.
  • Possible internal conflicts within Parimatch Group entities affecting governance and control.

Geopolitical Impact

  • The case involves entities linked to Ukraine (Parimatch founders and management), Curaçao (Abudantia incorporation), Cyprus (Rillius and trademark ownership), Hong Kong (Fastron incorporation), and Turkey (target market).
  • The Russian invasion of Ukraine has displaced some Parimatch personnel to Cyprus, indicating geopolitical instability affecting corporate operations.
  • The Turkish-speaking market is a strategic growth area, with regulatory risks prompting indirect market entry.
  • Other countries referenced in the broader Parimatch network and operations include China, India, Kuwait, Pakistan, Russia, Turkey, UK, and Ukraine, highlighting a complex multinational footprint.

Economic Intelligence

  • Parimatch Group is a multi-million-dollar international online gaming enterprise with significant revenues.
  • Abudantia operates a profitable Turkish sports betting site, Bettilt, generating approximately $1-2 million monthly.
  • The joint venture’s performance is contested, impacting potential revenue streams and brand expansion.
  • PMI, a key Parimatch affiliate, employs around 200 staff and ranks among the top five post-CIS e-gaming companies.
  • The dispute may affect future licensing fees, termination sums, and market penetration strategies.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Clarify contractual terms on renewal and termination to avoid future ambiguities.
  • Strengthen governance and operational oversight within the Parimatch Group and affiliates.
  • Monitor regulatory developments in Turkish-speaking and other emerging markets to mitigate entry risks.
  • Manage public relations proactively to protect brand reputation amid litigation.
  • Consider alternative dispute resolution to preserve business relationships and market access.
  • Evaluate geopolitical risks, especially related to Ukraine and Cyprus, in operational planning.

---

**Source Notes:**

Sanctions Intelligence Digest | [https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/234.html](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/234.html)

Brief metadata