Empyrean Protocol

Empyrean Intelligence Console

← Back to briefs

Leggett & Ors v American International Group UK Ltd (Rev1) [2025] EWHC 278 (Comm) (12 February 2025)

Source: Open mirrored case · Original bailii.org

Sanctions ✓ Geo ✓

Executive Summary

This case concerns whether American International Group UK Ltd (AIG) must indemnify 41 Claimants under a professional indemnity insurance policy issued to Giambrone Law LLP (in liquidation) ("the LLP"). The Claimants obtained judgments against the LLP for losses arising from negligent legal services related to off-plan property investments in Italy. AIG denies liability, arguing the claims relate to liabilities transferred from the predecessor firm (Giambrone & Law, "the Firm") and thus fall outside the Policy’s scope. The court is addressing whether AIG is bound by the judgments and if the Policy covers the Claimants’ losses.

Sanctions Highlights

  • No direct sanctions imposed on parties in this litigation.
  • However, the case implicates cross-border legal and financial risks involving entities linked to Kuwait and Lebanon, jurisdictions subject to UK regulatory scrutiny.
  • The Policy’s compliance with Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Minimum Terms and Conditions, which may have indirect sanctions implications, is contested by AIG.

Emerging Risks

  • Potential erosion of professional indemnity insurance coverage due to disputes over successor liability and policy scope.
  • Risk of precedent affecting insurers’ willingness to cover claims involving firm restructurings or transfers.
  • Possible exposure of insurers to aggregated claims exceeding policy limits, as AIG asserts the £3m limit has been exhausted.
  • Legal uncertainty over transfer of liabilities between predecessor and successor legal practices.

Geopolitical Impact

  • The Claimants include investors from Kuwait and Lebanon, highlighting cross-jurisdictional investment and legal risk exposure.
  • UK courts’ handling of professional indemnity insurance claims involving foreign investors may influence international confidence in UK legal and insurance markets.
  • The case underscores the UK’s regulatory environment for solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance, impacting international legal service providers.

Economic Intelligence

  • The damages awarded total approximately £3.5 million plus costs, reflecting significant financial exposure for the insurer.
  • The LLP’s liquidation and lack of assets shift financial responsibility to AIG under the Policy, subject to legal interpretation.
  • The dispute over policy limits and coverage may affect future insurance premiums and underwriting practices in the UK legal sector.
  • The case may influence investor confidence in off-plan property developments in Italy marketed to Middle Eastern clients.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitor the court’s ruling on the scope of indemnity coverage and successor liability to anticipate insurer exposure.
  • Assess insurance policy wording and compliance with SRA Minimum Terms to mitigate coverage disputes.
  • Advise clients with cross-border investments on risks related to successor firm liabilities and insurance protections.
  • Engage with regulators and insurers to clarify standards for professional indemnity insurance in firm restructurings.
  • Prepare for potential ripple effects on UK legal insurance markets and international investor protections.

---

**Source Notes:**

Sanctions Intelligence Digest, [https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/278.html](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/278.html)

Brief metadata