Executive Summary
This case involves Sanlam General Insurance Ghana Ltd’s claim against Sustainable Growth Fund II SCSP SICAV-SIF (a Luxembourg-based private equity fund) for $1 million plus interest under a promissory note and a corporate counter guarantee. The defendant failed to appear or properly defend the claim, despite acknowledging the debt in prior correspondence. The English High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the claimant, affirming jurisdiction under English law and rejecting the defendant’s arguments on legal personality and jurisdictional grounds.
Sanctions Highlights
- No sanctions implications identified in the case.
- No references to sanctions regimes or restrictions affecting parties or transactions.
Emerging Risks
- Legal risk from unclear corporate structures of Luxembourg SCSP entities, particularly regarding legal personality and enforceability of judgments.
- Potential enforcement challenges in foreign jurisdictions due to the defendant’s status as an unincorporated entity without separate legal personality.
- Risk of defendants exploiting procedural technicalities (e.g., jurisdictional challenges, entity status) to delay or avoid payment.
Geopolitical Impact
- The case underscores the role of English law and courts as a preferred jurisdiction for cross-border commercial disputes involving UK, US, and Luxembourg entities.
- Highlights the continuing influence of UK legal frameworks in international finance and litigation, despite Brexit.
- Involvement of US dollar-denominated obligations reflects the global dominance of the US dollar in private equity and financing arrangements.
Economic Intelligence
- The dispute centers on bridge financing for Biwater International Limited, illustrating risks in private equity capital injections and guarantees.
- The $1 million claim reflects potential liquidity and credit risks for insurers providing guarantees in emerging markets (Ghana).
- The case signals the importance of clear contractual documentation and enforceable guarantees in cross-border finance.
Strategic Recommendations
- Parties engaging with Luxembourg SCSP funds should conduct thorough due diligence on entity structure and legal personality to assess enforceability risks.
- Use English law and jurisdiction clauses to ensure access to a robust legal framework for dispute resolution.
- Maintain clear, unconditional guarantees and promissory notes with explicit payment obligations to mitigate collection risks.
- Monitor correspondence and admissions carefully as evidence of liability in litigation.
- Prepare for potential enforcement challenges in jurisdictions unfamiliar with SCSP structures by securing reasoned judgments (summary judgment preferred over default).
---
**Source Notes:**
Sanlam General Insuruance Ghana Ltd v Sustainable Growth Fund II SCSP SICAV-SIF [2025] EWHC 559 (Comm)
https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/559.txt