Executive Summary
- Dispute between Chugga Chugg Pty Ltd (Australian superyacht procurer) and Privinvest Holding SAL (Lebanese holding company) over a contract for a 79.99m luxury yacht built by Nobiskrug GmbH (German shipyard).
- Contract signed Nov 2018, price €99.55m, delivery originally Aug 2022; delayed due to mismanagement and COVID-19 force majeure.
- Nobiskrug entered insolvency in Germany April 2021; arbitration initiated but discontinued due to insolvency.
- Chugga Chugg claims repudiation by Nobiskrug; Privinvest claims repudiation by Chugga Chugg.
- English court ruling focuses on guarantee by Privinvest and contractual obligations amid insolvency and pandemic disruptions.
Sanctions Highlights
- Sanctions implications arise due to involvement of German company Nobiskrug and Lebanese Privinvest, with potential EU and UK sanctions considerations.
- Privinvest’s parent guarantee and financial dealings may be impacted by BIS (UK’s Export Control) regulations given export controls on shipbuilding technology.
- Insolvency and financial restructuring of Nobiskrug raise compliance risks under sanctions regimes affecting German entities.
- No direct sanctions enforcement action noted, but heightened scrutiny on cross-border payments and guarantees involving German and Lebanese entities.
Emerging Risks
- Insolvency of Nobiskrug creates risk of non-performance and financial loss for foreign clients like Chugga Chugg.
- COVID-19 related force majeure claims complicate contractual obligations and dispute resolution.
- Arbitration disruption due to insolvency and administrator withdrawal increases litigation uncertainty.
- Potential reputational risk for Privinvest and associated entities due to insolvency and contract disputes.
- Cross-jurisdictional enforcement challenges between English law, German insolvency law, and Lebanese corporate governance.
Geopolitical Impact
- Germany’s insolvency laws and shipbuilding industry stability affected by Nobiskrug’s collapse, impacting international maritime contracts.
- UK courts assert jurisdiction over guarantee claims, reinforcing London’s role as a key forum for international commercial disputes.
- Lebanon’s Privinvest group’s financial difficulties reflect broader regional economic instability.
- UK and German regulatory frameworks intersect, highlighting complexities in transnational commercial litigation involving EU and UK post-Brexit legal regimes.
Economic Intelligence
- Contract price €99.55m with €9.955m guarantee by Privinvest, reflecting significant financial exposure.
- Nobiskrug’s insolvency and underpricing of contracts indicate systemic financial mismanagement in German shipbuilding sector.
- Chugga Chugg’s claim for repayment exceeds €14m, including instalments and third-party liabilities.
- Escrow arrangements and delayed payments show risk mitigation attempts but insufficient to prevent financial losses.
- Insolvency proceedings and arbitration outcomes will influence creditor recoveries and future contract risk assessments in luxury yacht market.
Strategic Recommendations
- Monitor UK and EU sanctions updates related to shipbuilding and Lebanese entities to ensure compliance.
- Assess financial exposure and recovery prospects from Nobiskrug insolvency and Privinvest guarantee.
- Consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms given arbitration disruption and insolvency complications.
- Engage with insolvency administrators and legal counsel in Germany to protect creditor interests.
- Review contractual clauses on force majeure and guarantees for future maritime projects to mitigate pandemic-related risks.
- Leverage UK court jurisdiction for enforcement of guarantees and counterclaims where possible.
---
**Source Notes:**
Sanctions Intelligence Digest, [https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/585.html](https://empyreanprotocol.com/litigation/view/www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2025/585.html)